{"id":33,"date":"2018-10-07T20:10:10","date_gmt":"2018-10-07T20:10:10","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.uww.edu\/j486danmiller\/?p=33"},"modified":"2018-10-07T20:10:10","modified_gmt":"2018-10-07T20:10:10","slug":"proposed-increase-of-fines-in-whitewater","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.uww.edu\/j486danmiller\/2018\/10\/07\/proposed-increase-of-fines-in-whitewater\/","title":{"rendered":"Proposed increase of fines in Whitewater"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The Whitewater Common Council debated an increase in fines related to damage of landmark properties on Tuesday night.<\/p>\n<p>Previously, the fines for damage to a landmark property through vandalism or theft was not less than $450 nor more than $700. The proposed ordinance would increase this fine to not less than $1,000, not including the cost of damages to the property.<\/p>\n<p>The ordinance would relate to both public landmarks, such as the Whitewater Effigy Mounds Preserve, and privately owned historical houses.<\/p>\n<p>The debate that ensued raised questions about the fairness of the increased fines.<\/p>\n<p>Councilman Lynn Binnie hinted at the \u201c\u2026possible unintended consequences\u2026\u201d that could go along with people unknowingly damaging a landmark.<\/p>\n<p>The council discussed the potential consequences and looked for a way to use the proposed fines as a preventative to discourage vandalism and theft in the first place. The biggest concern was on how to make people aware of the new fine.<\/p>\n<p>Many of the council members agreed that all landmarks, public and private, must have proper signage distinguishing them from other buildings and houses within the city. According to Pat Blackmer, a member of the Landmark Committee, all privately owned historic houses have a boulder with a plaque noting them as a historical landmark.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Someone committing vandalism is not looking for a sign,&#8221; said Councilman Jimmy Schulgit.<\/p>\n<p>Schulgit proposed the ordinance at an earlier date, according the Binnie, and was in favor of it despite hesitation by other council members.<\/p>\n<p>This ordinance was tabled for a later date after debate. It was concluded that more research needed to be done on the topic.<\/p>\n<p>Despite the proposed amendment being tabled, the increase in the fine for damage to landmarks is following a trend that started during the Sept. 4 meeting related to the increasing of fines for many other offences.<\/p>\n<p>The Sept. 4 meeting discussed the possibility of raising the fines for a variety of offences from disobeying a police officer to trespassing. All the fines discussed in the meeting were tabled for a later date.<\/p>\n<p>The increase in the fine for damage to landmarks will be included in this later discussion.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Council budget review<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>City Manager Cameron Clapper introduced the proposed 2019 city budget on Tuesday night.<\/p>\n<p>The proposed 2019 budget will be $26,259,403, with a general fund of $9,658,650.<\/p>\n<p>The operating budget will include a property tax levy of $3,838,047. This is an increase from the 2018 budget by $364,247. The increase comes from the loss of $312,771 in one-time funds used in the 2018 budget.<\/p>\n<p>The city will also receive a decrease in state funding for shared municipal services.<\/p>\n<p>These are services provided by the city and used by the University of Wisconsin-Whitewater, such as emergency services and the use of the Wastewater Treatment Plant. All cities in Wisconsin with a UW campus receive this funding.<\/p>\n<p>While the city should expect a payment of $281,417 for the services, the actual payment will be about 38 percent of that amount, according to Clapper.<\/p>\n<p>\u201c[The reduced funding] concentrates the reliance on other local property owners to carry the cost of providing municipal services,\u201d Clapper said. \u201cWhich adds to the overall local property tax.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>There were seven major capital projects Clapper mentioned in the 2019 budget. The Milwaukee Street reconstruction, the Old Mill Dam repairs, a new self-contained breathing apparatus for the fire station and a water main replacement on Ann Street were considered \u201ccore\u201d items. Street light replacements, lake drawdowns and dredging, and construction on the Cravath Lake Amphitheater were included to \u201c\u2026enhance existing services.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The budget presented Tuesday night is only a proposed budget. The Finance Committee will meet publicly on Oct. 4, 11 and 18 to review the 2019 budget.<\/p>\n<p>A presentation of the changes will be given during the Nov. 8 meeting. The budget will likely be approved at the public hearing on Nov. 20.<\/p>\n<p>In other action, the Common Council on Tuesday:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Heard a proclamation acknowledging CROP Walk Day as Oct. 7. Registration is at 12:30 p.m., the walk starts at 1 p.m. The event will start at Fairhaven Senior Services and it will end at the Armory. This will be Whitewater&#8217;s 28th year hosting a Crop Hunger Walk.<\/li>\n<li>Approved a change in parking restrictions, making it illegal to park on Church Street between 2 and 5 a.m. year-round.<\/li>\n<li>Approved a city ordinance banning the sale and possession of electronic cigarettes to minors. The new fines are $400 from $100 for the first offense, and $500 from $200 for the second offense.<\/li>\n<li>Approved a roofing contract worth $38,689 to replace the aged and leaky roof of the Wastewater Treatment Plant in Whitewater.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Whitewater Common Council debated an increase in fines related to damage of landmark properties on Tuesday night. Previously, the fines for damage to a landmark property through vandalism or theft was not less than $450 nor more than $700. The proposed ordinance would increase this fine to not less than $1,000, not including the &hellip; <\/p>\n<p class=\"link-more\"><a href=\"https:\/\/blogs.uww.edu\/j486danmiller\/2018\/10\/07\/proposed-increase-of-fines-in-whitewater\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Proposed increase of fines in Whitewater&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":6752,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-33","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.uww.edu\/j486danmiller\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/33","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.uww.edu\/j486danmiller\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.uww.edu\/j486danmiller\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.uww.edu\/j486danmiller\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/6752"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.uww.edu\/j486danmiller\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=33"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.uww.edu\/j486danmiller\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/33\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":34,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.uww.edu\/j486danmiller\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/33\/revisions\/34"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.uww.edu\/j486danmiller\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=33"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.uww.edu\/j486danmiller\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=33"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.uww.edu\/j486danmiller\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=33"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}