{"id":27,"date":"2017-09-15T18:06:18","date_gmt":"2017-09-15T18:06:18","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.uww.edu\/j237nathankober\/?p=27"},"modified":"2017-09-15T18:06:18","modified_gmt":"2017-09-15T18:06:18","slug":"my-online-self","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.uww.edu\/j237nathankober\/2017\/09\/15\/my-online-self\/","title":{"rendered":"My Online Self"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Nathan Kober <\/span><\/p>\n<p>Absorbing the present history online<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">My newsgathering patterns online are fairly pitiful, and definitely not what they should be. I am probably more informed than the average person, because I am what is known colloquially as \u201cExtremely Online\u201d, but I do not read as many in depth articles as I often mean to. Like most people online it is probably more accurate to say that I read headlines than the news. Most of the headlines I read are shared on Facebook, where I follow a variety of outlets like the NYT, WaPo, The Intercept and some political organizations. <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">So a typical day of newsgathering, or rather news absorbing, could begin with me scrolling down facebook to see the awful clickbait headlines that every news outlets thinks they should post ([Celebrity] has PERFECT response to Trump tweetstorm), as well as the more direct headlines that are posted for actual news. I\u2019ll also check reddit, specifically the news and worldnews subreddits, which typically offer a better, more concentrated array of stories. I normally don\u2019t click on the actual story but I will look at the reddit comments, where sometimes people will post related stories or updates. As always the experience is strange, as a story about some vapid political sex scandal lays next to a story of ethnic cleansing in Burma, and your mind contorts wildly to absorb both simultaneously. <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">I do follow a handful of news outlets and journalists habitually. For example I read anything written by Jeremy Scahill, Naomi Klein, or Glenn Greenwald, all of whom work at The Intercept. I\u2019ll also follow journalists on Facebook and sometimes end up checking people\u2019s twitter feeds to see what is going on in the political\/media establishment. It\u2019s a dark habit, but as the internet becomes such a central aspect of modern communication, for better and worse, I really don\u2019t think you can understand the modern world without being jacked into the matrix to some extent. I haven\u2019t jumped into the abyss and made a twitter account yet, but I am planning on it, since the platform is weirdly ubiquitous among the media class. <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">As a committed reader, I do try to set aside a long read every once in awhile, if not every day to, actually sit down and fully absorb. I\u2019ve found it is much easier to read a book for a long stretch of time than it is to read something online, where all of the distraction is so available, but it\u2019s not impossible to read a long piece if you set aside the time. These are not always strictly news; sometimes I\u2019ll read an essay, like this one on <\/span><a href=\"http:\/\/bleacherreport.com\/articles\/2732670-colin-kaepernick-anthem-race-in-america\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Colin Kaepernick<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">, or this investigation into <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.gq.com\/story\/dylann-roof-making-of-an-american-terrorist\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Dylan Roof<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">, which was pretty incredible. I\u2019ll also look deeper into a subject that I come across if it seems interesting, in the typical online pattern of going from one link to the next. So for example, the other day I was reading The Sixth Extinction by Elizabeth Kolbert, and ended up searching for related stories online out of curiosity. <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Unfortunately there is little rhyme or reason in any of this, other than the habits that form naturally without any planning. I don\u2019t schedule a time of day that I am going to spend looking at news online, or looking into something that interests me. Obviously if I am actually researching something, then the pattern is very different, and I\u2019ll usually just overload myself with various articles on whatever subject I am looking into, until I have three different browsers with 20 tabs open on each. That may at least be a strategy, but it is barely ordered. <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">In it\u2019s own strange way the internet is a microcosm of history\u2019s control over the present. Tuning into the myriad stories, forces, tragedies and farces that are shaping the world at any moment by going online is like stepping into a \u00a0whirlpool that we find ourselves thrown by, rather than controlling. That reality isn\u2019t anything new, but in a more isolated day to day life it is harder to feel the currents of history constantly churning. Being online allows you to be more in tune to current events and their historical context than ever before, but you are still in the maw just like everyone else. <\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Nathan Kober Absorbing the present history online My newsgathering patterns online are fairly pitiful, and definitely not what they should be. I am probably more informed than the average person, because I am what is known colloquially as \u201cExtremely Online\u201d, &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/blogs.uww.edu\/j237nathankober\/2017\/09\/15\/my-online-self\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":6930,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-27","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.uww.edu\/j237nathankober\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/27","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.uww.edu\/j237nathankober\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.uww.edu\/j237nathankober\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.uww.edu\/j237nathankober\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/6930"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.uww.edu\/j237nathankober\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=27"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.uww.edu\/j237nathankober\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/27\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":28,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.uww.edu\/j237nathankober\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/27\/revisions\/28"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.uww.edu\/j237nathankober\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=27"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.uww.edu\/j237nathankober\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=27"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.uww.edu\/j237nathankober\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=27"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}