LEAP Chat Joe and Becky Hogan Part 2 – 3

Posted in Interviews | Leave a comment

LEAP Chat Joe and Becky Hogan Part 1 – 3

Posted in Interviews | Leave a comment

Support Your Core

Academic Support Center services for the Core courses

Are there students in your Core courses who seem to be struggling? Do you think they might benefit from additional assistance either inside or outside the classroom? The Academic Support Center might be able to help! It offers “peer-driven, cooperative learning” where student learning assistants work with you and mentor your students (working with small groups or one-on-one) to help them master the course content.

What assistance is available?

Supplemental Instruction provides structured study times with a group leader who has successfully completed the course. Check the web page to see a comparison of final grade averages for S.I. students v. non-S.I. students!

In-Class Tutorial Support places learning assistants right in the classroom to give students an extra level of support. The web page lists courses that use the service.

Cyber-Tutoring for Commuters and Online Learners provides writing tutoring in the online environment instead of face-to-face.

The primary focus of the Center is 100 and 200 level courses. However, a couple of your colleagues teaching GENED390 (World of Ideas) also use these services, and have good things to say:

Crista Lebens said, “I think having the writing mentor in class increased their awareness of writing as a skill that can be improved in this course.” After using an in-class Writing Mentor in a section of World of Ideas, she received several comments from students saying they thought their writing skills had improved. Last semester several of her students also took advantage of cyber-tutoring–students who would not otherwise have gotten assistance writing. She said, “Any time students take the initiative to improve their writing skills, I think it supports a campus-wide expectation that our students be competent, and perhaps accomplished writers. This semester I have announced the availability of a writing mentor, especially for online consulting. One student has already indicated he will pursue this opportunity. I am sure that the online availability means more students will consider using this resource.”

David Reinhart said, “Honestly, I was becoming discouraged about assigning a research paper to my GenEd 390 course. Since reaching out to the Writing Center and asking for help, things are better. A specific tutor was assigned to the class who knows exactly what the expectations are for the writing assignment. Janina Wesolowski is a wonderful help. We discuss the scaffolding of the paper assignment, schedule multiple due dates, making it more possible to provide timely feedback to students. Generally speaking, student writing is improved. Plus it’s just fun working with a grad student who is excited about teaching.”

Posted in Resources | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Big Ideas in the Core

What is the one thing I want my students to take from this class?

Every semester, I try to remind myself of this question — that, if students take nothing from Individual & Society but one thing, what would I want it to be? I think it helps me to remember what I’m trying to do with my Gen-Ed Core Course, and that content isn’t everything.

But maybe the bigger question is: What is the one thing WE, as faculty, want OUR students — all UW-Whitewater students — to take from their collective experience in the Core Courses?

What are the Big Ideas we’re trying to impart?

For me, the answer would relate to Only Connect, the reading I now require for my I&S students at the beginning of the semester. In the essay, William Cronon talks about education as a means of bettering the community as a whole, as a way of fostering a civic consciousness and a more collectivist conception of the world and our place in it.

So many of our students are here for a degree, a piece of paper that they see as a step toward an individual goal, an individualist life. Many of my students have expressed surprise at the idea that one should become more aware of and connected to and concerned about the community one lives in as a hallmark of being educated. And yet, I would argue that this is the very reason we want students to have a common educational experience in the Core — I believe that we are here to help students learn how to think, to put their skills and talent to use for a purpose bigger than a paycheck.

What do you think? What’s the One Big Idea for the Core, in your mind?

Posted in Big Ideas, Evening Cocktails, Principles of Excellence | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

The Journey to Knowledge

Many of you have seen this rather famous diagram before. I found it helpful as a graduate student and researcher because it gave me direction. I felt less wobbly and adrift. Now that I am paid to be an educator, the same diagram offers more help.

K-12 provides a foundation of knowledge.

.

An undergraduate builds upon that foundation.

Masters work pushes out further within a chosen area.

Doctoral studies venture to the boundaries of knowledge. and then...

A dissertation contributes new knowledge to a chosen field of study.

The paper we call a PhD represents new knowledge contributed.

 

A diagram like this stirs the memory of our shared experience as faculty. Divergent interpretations of it are inevitable and may be rich soil for conversations to grow. As a graduate student several years ago this diagram spoke to me of courage. I saw this as a call to heroically pursue knowledge like Odysseus returning home after the conflagration. Today I also see the need for values like dependability and persistence, like Volodya the bus driver wonderfully described by Jane Gottlick.

There are some fundamental values and skills that students must learn at different stages of their respective journeys, and I count myself as a student still. The academic journey is always something like Blind Man’s Bluff, an old game where one is blindfolded and so must listen carefully for cues and clues to tag others, reaching forward for the unknown while also trying to keep oneself steady.

At this stage of my academic life the emphasis shifts to the facilitation of knowledge. As an educator, my task is to help students and peers in their journey as well. Difficult because we all have incredibly hectic schedules that make remembering our unique contribution to knowledge increasingly difficult. Continuing one’s research is crucial to stay current but maybe more important is our task of remembering and reflecting upon our journey to that knowledge. I think most every educator remembers their best teachers and so desires to pay in kind.

How can I pay it forward? In the book Academically Adrift, it states that an important goal for institutional improvement is “to take greater responsibility for shaping the developmental trajectories of students…”(127) The book cites studies that report 35 percent of the students sampled spent five hours or less a week studying alone; the average for all students was under 9 hours. Basic habits and a commitment of time, a valuing of academic work, are simple and yet important steps on the path toward knowledge. The beauty of Jane’s journal assignment is that it enculturates students into an academic life. She is making routine expectations on student time in reading, reflection, and writing.

This diagram of the academic life has stuck with me. Maybe it can serve us as a conversation starter about the grand narrative and values necessary to an academic life. I am finding the LEAP Principles of Excellence to be noble aspirations. These are a strategy for helping students journey toward knowledge, a journey that still calls for a type of heroism. As I have mentioned, less Achilles and more Odysseus than Odysseus, less star system and more collegiality, courageous enough to make demands on student time and generous enough to give up our own time, wise in giving direction and looking for ways to create win-win outcomes.

I am looking to learn some of this from students. Michael Hais, co-author of  Millennial Momentum says, “They are different because, unlike earlier generations, they are oriented toward one another, toward the group, towards society. They are not driven by individual desires or individual values.” Our students are part of the rising millennial generation that learns by collaboration and are driven by a desire to find win-win solutions. What does that mean for our diagram? I hope to see.

 

Posted in Big Ideas, Principles of Excellence | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment